CO vs SB 4-bet 13.8bb
GG Regular tables NL200 4-max ($1/$2) · 100bb · CO limps, SB isolates to 3bb, CO 3-bets to 6bb, SB 4-bets to 13.8bb · Cutoff to act
Regular tables NL200 · 4-max · 100bbChange game
Stacks (bb), if they differ
Pot 20.8bbYour cards?
6bb
13.8bb
1bb
Tap your two cards.
Cutoff's range
128 of 1,326 combos get hereFold 16.7%Call 83.3%All-in 100bb 0%
Tap a hand, or type one above, to see its exact mix.
What is the GTO play for the cutoff (CO) when CO limps, SB isolates to 3bb, CO 3-bets to 6bb, SB 4-bets to 13.8bb in GG Regular tables NL200 4-max at 100bb?
CO limps, SB isolates to 3bb, CO 3-bets to 6bb, SB 4-bets to 13.8bb in GG Regular tables NL200 4-max, 100bb: the cutoff (CO) folds 16.7% and calls 83.3%. Always call: QQ-KK, 55, A4s, A2s, 87s, AQo. Mixed: A7s.
- Always fold
- K8s
- Always call
- QQ-KK, 55, A4s, A2s, 87s, AQo
- Mixed
- A7s
Solved for: GGPoker Regular tables, NL200 ($1/$2), 4-max, 100bb stacks, 5% rake capped at 3bb. Solver: HoldemResources Calculator (HRC) (HRC CI 20.31). GG's jackpot fee on pots of 30bb and more is not in this solve, so lines that build big pots may be slightly too loose. Bet sizes are the solved ones; a size GG offers that is not here plays like the nearest one.